Full image link →
I’m in love
how about his rapes
His ALLEGED rapes
Whether or not he raped the women he is still a great activist for freedom of speech.
Also, in journalism we don’t say someone is a murderer/rapist/thief until they are convicted. We say alleged. Check a style book.
yeah ya know it’s not like rape is a big deal or anything
not like it would drastically affect your view of a person
also in the exciting new field of killing rapists we tend to take the word of the two victims over the word of one activist with far-reaching influence WHO DIDN’T EVEN DENY THE RAPE HE COMMITTED HE CONTESTED THE INTERPRETATION OF SWEDISH LAW
The rapes, if they actually happened, wouldn’t undo everything he has done to promote freedom of the press and freedom of speech. That would be like saying Johnson signing the Civil Rights Act doesn’t matter because he also escalated the Vietnam war.
no, it wouldn’t. It would be like saying Johnson raped women but signed the civil rights act. Rape is not akin to escalating the vietnam war. Rape is not akin to some act of politics. I never said his activism didn’t matter, I’m questioning what the fuck goes on in your head for you to be in love with a rapist who advocates for freedom of speech?
Source: ottosandwichgod
And again, we cannot call him a rapist until he is convicted. Ask any news organization, you need to say alleged.
no, it wouldn’t. It would be like saying Johnson raped women but signed the civil rights act. Rape is not akin to...
[cackling]